New research shows that managers fail to give time to learning

New research shows that managers fail to give time to learning

No time to learn

A new (2017) study looking at staff learning at an organisational level found that while management frequently decrees that learning should take place during working hours, time is rarely given to staff to do that learning.

This research briefing was sent to members in June 2017



99% of everything you are trying to do...

...has already been done by someone else, somewhere - and meticulously researched.

Get the latest research briefings, infographics and more from The Oxford Review - Free.

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit


Implicit and explicit knowledge

In organisational learning circles there are two types of knowledge that need to acquired:

  1. Tacit Knowledge
  2. Explicit Knowledge


Tacit knowledge is the type of knowledge that cannot be easily verbally expressed and is therefore not easily written, articulated or transferred between people, such as how to navigate the politics in an organisation, the ability to speak another language etc. Tacit knowledge is estimated to be about  70% of one’s work learning experience.

What tends to happen in organisations is that people with tacit knowledge and skills in an area tend to get used in that area. An example from the study was in an IT consultancy, those with better people skills were tasked with interacting with clients, yet those who had fewer developed skills of this kind were left to deal with coding and other back office work. This is hardly a developmental approach and can cause problems when or if the person with those skills leaves.

Explicit knowledge is the learning one takes from schooling or training usually through verbal and written explanation and can be passed on easily. This obviously is less of an issue.


Time to learn

Management will vs practical won’t

Whilst management is usually keen for knowledge, both explicit and implicit, to be shared within the teams, it tends to be picked up informally rather than occurring in any formal or planned way.

In theory, this would ensure that staff would continually develop their skills in the workplace and develop the organisation from their own learning. While this was all very well in practice, the study found that the opposite was the case.  Staff complained that they were given high workloads that used the knowledge they had gained already and were given little time to develop new knowledge or skills. An illustrative example given was one employee who said, “This place is pretty much self-learning. You need to be proactive”.

Others complained that individuals jealously kept the knowledge they had accrued and were not willing to share. This it was found was a real problem for developing organisational competitive advantage. In effect internal competition stifles organisational competitive advantage.

The problem it transpires is down to the contradictory pressures managers are under. First and foremost comes the pressure of productivity in their own area of responsibility. This pressure is immediate and is based and focused on productivity in this period / quarter / month. The pressure to develop team members comes a very poor second in this competition.


too much to do

Strategy / practice alignment

The solution the study found was to create alignment between the intentional organisational strategy of creating long term competitive advantage, which involves developing the staff and creating a learning culture or environment and current management practices.

Pushing learning out of the working space and time is counter-productive to this end.

Reference – available to members


New mobile learning and teaching methods are emerging: New research

Be impressively well informed

Get the very latest research intelligence briefings, video research briefings, infographics and more sent direct to you as they are published

Be the most impressively well-informed and up-to-date person around...

Powered by ConvertKit
Like what you see? Help us spread the word

David Wilkinson

David Wilkinson is the Editor-in-Chief of the Oxford Review. He is also acknowledged to be one of the world's leading experts in dealing with ambiguity and uncertainty and developing emotional resilience. David teaches and conducts research at a number of universities including the University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Division, Cardiff University, Oxford Brookes University School of Business and many more. He has worked with many organisations as a consultant and executive coach including Schroders, where he coaches and runs their leadership and management programmes, Royal Mail, Aimia, Hyundai, The RAF, The Pentagon, the governments of the UK, US, Saudi, Oman and the Yemen for example. In 2010 he developed the world's first and only model and programme for developing emotional resilience across entire populations and organisations which has since become known as the Fear to Flow model which is the subject of his next book. In 2012 he drove a 1973 VW across six countries in Southern Africa whilst collecting money for charity and conducting on the ground charity work including developing emotional literature in children and orphans in Africa and a number of other activities. He is the author of The Ambiguity Advanatage: What great leaders are great at, published by Palgrave Macmillian. See more: About: About David Wikipedia: David's Wikipedia Page