How organisations deal with dilemmas and emergencies – Press & Balance

Blog, Human Resources, Leadership, Management, Organisational Development, Research

This is the final part of 3 articles about how organisations deal with dilemmas and emergencies:

Part 1: ‘New research: Organisational responses to dilemmas and emergencies’

Part 2: 6 ways organisations deal with dilemmas

In this post we have a look at the conclusions of this research…

Be impressively well-informed

Get your FREE organizational and people development research briefings, infographics, video research briefings, a free copy of The Oxford Review and more...

Be impressively well-informed and up-to-date

Powered by ConvertKit

Press and balance

The researchers found that there are two primary issues organisations face in such situations. Press and balance:

  1. Press. This is the pressure or level of urgency the secondary order tensions, paradoxes and dilemmas places on the organisation to respond.
  2. Balance. This is how equal or not the various secondary order tensions, paradoxes and dilemmas are. If one is more prominent or pressing it can draw the response at the expense of the other issues.

What the researchers found was that different levels of press and balance tended to result in different types of response:

The study looked at the response of the emergency services, police, fire, medical, hospitals, military, government and other agencies and charities to complex situations that required multi-agency solutions to see how they fared.

What they discovered was that the emergency service infrastructures are actually pretty good at designing transcendence responses to these situations. Indeed over 40% of these services’ initial response to such situations is a transcendence response. Selection, segmentation and alternation type responses account for about 50% of the responses to complex situations and a small number of responses were denial (2.26%) and cosmetic (4.84%).

How does your organisation compare to this?

The researchers found that transcendence responses in organisations were significantly more likely when both press and balance were high. Where there was a combination of less press or less balance organisations appear to find this more ambiguous and, as a consequence, were much more likely to formulate an answer to these secondary order tensions, paradoxes and dilemmas with a less than ideal strategic response.

Reference

For members only

Be impressively well informed

Get the very latest research intelligence briefings, video research briefings, infographics and more sent direct to you as they are published

Be the most impressively well-informed and up-to-date person around...

Powered by Kit

Tags

Dilemmas, emergencies


You may also like

Seven Principles for Evidence-Based Culture Change

Seven Principles for Evidence-Based Culture Change

Typology of Conversational AI Use in Organisations

Typology of Conversational AI Use in Organisations
{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Subscribe to our newsletter now!

>