Cronyism in the Context of DEI: Definition and Full Explanation
Cronyism is a form of favouritism in which powerful individuals or decision-makers provide opportunities, jobs, or other benefits to their close friends or associates, regardless of their qualifications or merit. In the context of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), cronyism undermines fair and equitable processes, fostering an environment where biases and personal relationships dictate career advancements or access to resources, instead of competence or diversity-driven practices.
Definition:
Cronyism refers to the practice of giving preferential treatment to friends, associates, or individuals in a close social circle over others, often without regard to their actual skills, qualifications, or experience. In the workplace, cronyism can lead to the promotion of unqualified individuals, stifling diversity of thought and perspective, which are vital for innovation and progress. Cronyism is often intertwined with power dynamics and can exist in both public and private sectors, with negative impacts on organisational culture and employee morale.
Cronyism and DEI: The Impact
In a DEI framework, cronyism can be particularly damaging because it prevents diverse talent from gaining equal access to opportunities. This practice can perpetuate the exclusion of underrepresented groups, as individuals from privileged networks tend to benefit from connections rather than abilities. When cronyism thrives, it not only discriminates against those who are not part of a particular network but also perpetuates a homogeneous workplace where diversity in race, gender, sexual orientation, and cognitive perspectives is undervalued.
For example, in a company aiming to increase diversity within its leadership team, if senior leaders hire or promote friends with similar backgrounds to their own, they undermine the efforts to build an inclusive workplace. This creates a barrier for individuals from marginalised or minority groups who may be equally or more qualified but are excluded from decision-making circles.
Example:
Consider a scenario in a large corporation where a manager consistently promotes their close friends to key positions, bypassing formal hiring procedures. Even though there are more qualified candidates from different backgrounds, the manager’s decision is based on personal relationships rather than merit. As a result, the department lacks diverse perspectives, and employees from underrepresented groups feel discouraged from pursuing leadership roles. This form of cronyism not only hinders diversity but also affects overall team performance due to the absence of varied experiences and ideas.
How to Combat Cronyism and Promote DEI
To address cronyism within organisations and create a more equitable workplace, businesses must:
- Establish Transparent Hiring Processes: All recruitment and promotion processes should be standardised and transparent, ensuring that opportunities are open to all qualified candidates regardless of personal connections.
- Implement Bias Training: Leaders should undergo bias and DEI training to recognise and eliminate cronyistic practices that may unintentionally favour certain groups over others.
- Promote Accountability: Companies should introduce accountability mechanisms, such as audits or reviews, to ensure that hiring and promotional decisions are based on merit and align with DEI goals.
- Encourage Diverse Networks: Organisations should encourage networking across departments and support mentorship programmes that foster connections beyond established social circles, helping individuals from diverse backgrounds gain visibility.
Conclusion:
Cronyism, when left unchecked, can severely undermine the principles of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. It fosters an unequal environment where only those with certain connections succeed, while others—often from marginalised groups—are excluded from opportunities they rightfully deserve. By actively combatting cronyism through transparent processes and promoting diversity, organisations can create a fairer, more inclusive workplace that values talent, innovation, and diverse perspectives over personal relationships.
By addressing cronyism, organisations not only improve equity but also foster a more dynamic and creative workforce.
References:
Khatri, N., Tsang, E. W., & Begley, T. M. (2006). Cronyism: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 61-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400171
Coco, G., & Lagravinese, R. (2014). Cronyism and education performance. Economic Modelling, 38, 443-450. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264999314000418
Pearce, J. L. (2015). Cronyism and nepotism are bad for everyone: The research evidence. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 41-44. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology/article/abs/cronyism-and-nepotism-are-bad-for-everyone-the-research-evidence/7EED4D042812470B60D0312008DBA438
Be impressively well informed
Get the very latest research intelligence briefings, video research briefings, infographics and more sent direct to you as they are published
Be the most impressively well-informed and up-to-date person around...