Double Bind: Navigating Complex Constraints in DEI
In the realm of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), understanding and addressing double bind is crucial. Double Bind is a significant aspect of this discourse, but what exactly does it entail?
Definition:
In the context of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), a Double Bind refers to a paradoxical situation in which an individual faces two conflicting demands, expectations, or social pressures, where successfully meeting one demand means failing to meet the other. This often results in frustration, reduced decision-making power, and a heightened risk of negative consequences, as the person cannot resolve the situation without experiencing some form of disadvantage. Double binds are frequently observed in marginalised or underrepresented groups, where societal expectations create conflicting roles or standards.
Example:
A common double bind occurs for women in the workplace. Women leaders often face a paradoxical expectation: they are pressured to display warmth and approachability to avoid negative judgments associated with assertiveness. However, if they lean too far into empathy and warmth, they may be viewed as lacking authority or competence, often seen as “too nice” or ineffective in leadership roles. This double bind creates an almost no-win situation for women striving to succeed in leadership without facing criticism for traits associated with either “masculine” or “feminine” behaviors.
Conclusion:
Addressing double binds is crucial to advancing DEI goals. Double binds perpetuate barriers that discourage full participation and fair evaluation of individuals in diverse environments. Recognising and addressing these paradoxes through training, policy adjustments, and awareness campaigns can reduce systemic inequities and create a more inclusive, fair workplace culture. By addressing the double bind, organisations can foster an environment where diverse talents are evaluated equitably and feel empowered to bring their full selves to work.
References:
Watzlawick, P. (1963). A review of the double bind theory. Family Process. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1965-06240-001
Malcom, L., & Malcom, S. (2011). The double bind: The next generation. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 162-172. https://meridian.allenpress.com/her/article-abstract/81/2/162/32044/The-Double-Bind-The-Next-Generation
Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (1975). Varieties of double bind. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 17(3), 143-157. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00029157.1975.10403733
Be impressively well informed
Get the very latest research intelligence briefings, video research briefings, infographics and more sent direct to you as they are published
Be the most impressively well-informed and up-to-date person around...