Double Jeopardy: Understanding the DEI Implications
In the realm of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), understanding and addressing double jeopardy is crucial. Double jeopardy is a significant aspect of this discourse, but what exactly does it entail?
Definition:
In Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), Double Jeopardy refers to the compounded discrimination or disadvantage individuals face when they belong to multiple marginalised groups. This concept highlights the intersectionality of identities, acknowledging that people can face heightened prejudice due to overlapping factors, such as race, gender, socioeconomic status, or disability. Originally rooted in legal and criminological contexts, Double Jeopardy in DEI reveals how intertwined identities amplify discrimination, requiring more nuanced strategies for fostering true inclusivity.
How DEI Initiatives Address Double Jeopardy:
Organisations are increasingly recognising Double Jeopardy as they advance DEI efforts. By promoting intersectional policies, companies can create an environment where individuals from diverse backgrounds can contribute without facing compounded discrimination. This includes offering anti-bias training and prioritising representation across all minority groups, ensuring that all employees receive equal treatment and opportunities.
Example:
Consider the case of Maria, a Latina engineer with a disability. Maria’s experience reflects Double Jeopardy because she faces bias not only as a woman in a male-dominated field but also due to her ethnic background and physical disability. She may find herself stereotyped, underestimated, or overlooked in ways that her non-disabled White male peers do not. This Double Jeopardy scenario can impact her professional growth, making it difficult for her to achieve the same career advancement opportunities, despite her qualifications and skills.
To combat these effects, companies must implement tailored DEI policies, such as diverse hiring practices, inclusive workspaces, and mentorship programs. Recognising Maria’s unique challenges and offering support can help her thrive while promoting a more inclusive organisational culture.
Conclusion:
Double Jeopardy is an essential concept in DEI, illustrating how overlapping marginalized identities can intensify discrimination. By understanding and addressing the unique challenges these individuals face, organisations can create inclusive, equitable workplaces where everyone has the opportunity to succeed. Acknowledging Double Jeopardy not only strengthens DEI initiatives but also fosters a more compassionate and understanding corporate culture, benefiting both individuals and the organization as a whole.
References:
Ehrenberg, A. S., Goodhardt, G. J., & Barwise, T. P. (1990). Double jeopardy revisited. Journal of marketing, 54(3), 82-91. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002224299005400307
Sigler, J. A. (1963). A history of double jeopardy. The American Journal of Legal History, 7(4), 283-309. https://www.jstor.org/stable/844041
Be impressively well informed
Get the very latest research intelligence briefings, video research briefings, infographics and more sent direct to you as they are published
Be the most impressively well-informed and up-to-date person around...