Ableist Language – Definition and Explanation

In the realm of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), understanding and addressing ableism is crucial. Ableist language is a significant aspect of this discourse, but what exactly does it entail? 

Watch

Listen to this article

Free DEI Research Briefings

Definition:

Ableist language refers to words, phrases, or expressions that discriminate against or marginalise individuals with disabilities. This type of language reinforces harmful stereotypes, perpetuates inequality, and undermines the rights and dignity of people with disabilities. It can occur both consciously and unconsciously in everyday speech, media, literature, and other forms of communication.

Why is it Important to Address Ableist Language?

Addressing ableist language is essential for fostering an inclusive environment where all individuals feel valued and respected, regardless of their abilities. When ableist language goes unchallenged, it can contribute to systemic discrimination, exclusion, and barriers to participation for people with disabilities. By raising awareness and promoting the use of respectful and inclusive language, organisations and communities can create a more equitable and accessible society for everyone.

Examples:

One common example of ableist language is the casual use of terms like “crazy” or “lame” to describe something undesirable or inadequate. These words have derogatory connotations associated with mental health and physical disabilities, perpetuating stigma and disrespect towards individuals who may experience these challenges.

Another example is the use of phrases like “wheelchair-bound” or “confined to a wheelchair” to describe someone who uses a wheelchair. Such language implies a sense of limitation or confinement, overlooking the fact that wheelchairs provide mobility and independence for many individuals.

A UK English example could be the phrase “blind to the truth,” which implies that blindness is synonymous with ignorance or lack of awareness. This usage reinforces negative stereotypes about blindness and suggests that people with visual impairments are incapable of understanding or perceiving reality.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, ableist language plays a significant role in perpetuating discrimination and exclusion against people with disabilities. By recognising and challenging ableist language, we can work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society where everyone is valued and respected. It is essential for individuals, organisations, and communities to actively promote the use of respectful and inclusive language as part of their commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).

References:

Bottema-Beutel, K., Kapp, S. K., Lester, J. N., Sasson, N. J., & Hand, B. N. (2021). Avoiding ableist language: Suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in adulthood, 3(1), 18-29. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/aut.2020.0014

Natri, H. M., Abubakare, O., Asasumasu, K., Basargekar, A., Beaud, F., Botha, M., … & Zisk, A. H. (2023). Anti‐ableist language is fully compatible with high‐quality autism research: Response to S inger et al.(2023). Autism Research, 16(4), 673-676. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aur.2928

Börstell, C. (2023, May). Ableist Language Teching over Sign Language Research. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Resources and Representations for Under-Resourced Languages and Domains (RESOURCEFUL-2023) (pp. 1-10). https://aclanthology.org/2023.resourceful-1.1/